ChatGPT vs Google BARD
Following the availability of ChatGPT to the public in November 2022, it was obvious that other tech giants would offer different versions. Then, in March 2023, the Bard artificial intelligence bot, Google's solution in response to OpenAI's revolutionary chatbot, was launched in two countries: the United States and the United Kingdom.
Bard is powered by a separate language model from ChatGPT and uses different data sources to formulate its responses. This means that Bard, ChatGPT's rival, doesn't always answer questions the same way, which makes this showdown between Google Bard and ChatGPT all the more interesting.
We were lucky to have access to these two devices: ChatGPT 4 and Google BARD. Our objective ? Putting these two revolutionary AIs to the test and revealing the real facts about how they compare. Here is the most complete duel between Google BARD and ChatGPT.
Also Read: Top 100 ChatGPT Prompts
ChatGPT vs Google BARD: How were they created?
The main distinction between ChatGPT and Google BARD is the language models they use. OpenAI's ChatGPT uses the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4), while Google BARD relies on its own language model designed to support dialog applications (LaMDA). Both had notable shortcomings. However, AI is constantly learning and improving.
Both models are based on revolutionary transformer technology, an artificial neural network designed to process sequential inputs.
GPT-3, along with its predecessors GPT-2 and GPT-4, was trained from a variety of texts from the Internet, such as websites, books, documents, articles, and more. 'others. In contrast, Google LaMDA learning was improved using Infiniset, a database focused primarily on conversations and dialogues.
Infiniset is powered by Common Crawl, Wikipedia, published documents, and a large collection of online discussions. Additionally, Google's BARD AI model was designed to search the Internet in real time, providing up-to-date and relevant answers to user questions.
ChatGPT also relies on training data collected from Common Crawl, Wikipedia, books, documents, articles and other open web content. However, the most recent information available is from 2021, meaning the AI engine has not yet caught up with the most recent developments in search and news.
It is important to note that GPT-4 and LaMDA are under development. As their capabilities improve, the dynamics of the rivalry between ChatGPT and Google BARD will evolve, changing the landscape of AI models for language as we know it.
ChatGPT Answers vs. Google BARD
In this section, we will examine the results provided by ChatGPT compared to Google BARD in three different tasks to determine which AI tool stands out in terms of accuracy, aptitude, data processing, and coding.
Note: Google Bard is currently only available in the USA and in English.
Accuracy and suitability of ChatGPT compared to Google BARD
Question : How much money do I need to run a clothing e-commerce site until it is profitable?
When we look at the answers provided by both models, ChatGPT 4 and Google BARD, we see that they both address similar aspects in their discussion of the cost of running ecommerce site under WordPress. Both AI models discuss domains, hosting themes, plugins, e-commerce platforms, marketing process, payments, shipping and inventory, and additional expenses.
There are subtle differences in how each AI presents information. ChatGPT 4 delves deeper into the topic by providing more precise information on the costs associated with each component.
In this case, it mentions WooCommerce in the review and gives an estimate of the cost of payment gateways (around 2.9% + thirty cents per transaction). ChatGPT 4 also emphasizes the importance of estimating variable and fixed expenses, as well as revenue forecasts, in order to determine the break-even point.
However, Google BARD's answer is much more succinct and gives a general overview of the costs involved. Although it covers all the important aspects, it does not provide specific figures or details regarding payment processing or e-commerce platforms.
So, we can agree that the winner of the aptitude test between ChatGPT and Google BARD is ChatGPT.
ChatGPT vs Google BARD: Information synthesis
Question: Explain JavaScript to a non-coder.
When each of the AI tools was asked to explain JavaScript to a non-coder, both provided solid answers.
ChatGPT 4 used the analogy of a chef following a recipe to explain how JavaScript is used to give instructions to a computer and allow it to perform different actions.
Google BARD took a more concrete approach and explained JavaScript as a language that developers use to create interactive websites and applications.
In both cases, the AI tools managed to convey the basic idea of JavaScript in a way that is accessible to non-coders.
Although both explanations are clear and easy to understand, Google BARD's answer offers a more detailed explanation of how JavaScript is used in software development.
Also Read: 7 Best AI Text To Video
ChatGPT vs Google BARD: For Programmers
Question: Generate HTML and CSS code for a tic tac toe game application.
By getting them to write code, ChatGPT 4's answer offers a more complete solution for creating the layout of a chess application.
The HTML and CSS code generated by ChatGPT 4 accurately displays a chessboard, with the pieces arranged in their starting positions. Additionally, the code includes CSS classes for each chess piece, indicating the use of images to represent them. This answer provides a solid foundation for developing a chess application.
In contrast, Google BARD's answer simply presents the HTML and CSS of a basic 8x8 chessboard with no pieces. Although it establishes the layout of a chess board, it does not provide the essential details needed to create a fully functional chess application.
What are the differences between ChatGPT and Google BARD?
Types of responses
LaMDA training emphasizes understanding user question intent and contextual nuances. To do this, Google researchers organized high-level concepts into hierarchical clusters, thereby guiding the model's answer selections.
The AI tool aims to produce authentic responses that closely resemble human speech. He even tries to move from one topic to another, just like a human conversation. However, judging by the responses we got from ChatGPT against BARD tests, LaMDA's capacity is still far from what it set out to be.
Oddly enough, OpenAI's GPT AI engine seems to be the most oriented towards natural language. This is due to his extensive training in web text and AI content generation based on statistical models. As a component of the popular ChatGPT chatbot, the GPT engine can also summarize, translate, and perform various text-based tasks.
Data used
While much of Google BARD's training data remains relatively unknown, LaMDA's research paper offers some crucial insights [1]. It reveals that 12.5% of training data comes from Common Crawl, similar to GPT-n models, and another 12.5% is taken from Wikipedia.
It turns out, however, that ChatGPT has more model parameters than Google BARD, with 175 billion versus 137 billion. These parameters are essentially adjustable elements that help the AI model adapt to the data during training. And while more parameters mean better synthesis of complex linguistic relationships, they also risk overfitting.
Internet access
The main flaw of ChatGPT has always been its inability to access the Internet. Despite improvements to the GPT-4 model, the AI chatbot relies on a data set that excludes events after September 2021.
On the other side of the spectrum, Google BARD boasts of real-time Internet connectivity. Just like Bing, BARD's AI searches the web and intelligently generates answers to various queries. This feature makes it very proficient in providing current information with minimum errors.
User interface
Both tools are quite simple, as they primarily interact with users through a search bar. There are some minor differences in functionality, however.
Google BARD supports voice commands through your device's microphone, providing a hands-free experience. It also includes a “Google it” button for seamless online searching beyond BARD.
The AI interface also offers a “drafts” option that presents multiple variations of responses per prompt, allowing users to select the most appropriate response. The user-friendly activity view even shows past prompts, with options to see details or delete entries. Alternatively, users can opt out of storing BARD activities.
ChatGPT, on the other hand, organizes prompts into conversations in the sidebar, encouraging longer discussions on specific topics. Users can rename or delete these conversations, but finding answers to individual prompts requires scrolling.
Feature Comparison: ChatGPT vs Google Bard
Text generation
ChatGPT as well as Google Bard are useful tools for creating text, ranging from short summaries to writing a poem or essay. ChatGPT was trained on texts from the Internet, while Google Bard was trained on specific datasets for conversations.
This is the reason why some people feel that ChatGPT is superior for creating paragraphs, summaries, and other text-based processing tasks, while Google Bard is better for conversations.
However, since ChatGPT is built from data primarily collected from 2021 to present, it does not have access to the entire data set available online, unlike Google Bard, and therefore it cannot provide up-to-date answers.
For example, if your company wants to use ChatGPT to learn more about using Google Bard, ChatGPT won't be able to provide the information.
Also Read: ChatGPT Code Interpeter Tutorial
Responses to conversations
ChatGPT as well as Google Bard are trained on datasets containing billions of variables, resulting in remarkably human-like responses. Additionally, has over 100 trillion parameters. However, because Google Bard was trained on data readily available on the Internet as well as an up-to-date library, it is able to provide more recent information than ChatGPT's responses.
For example, if you ask “What happened yesterday in Budapest?”, Google Bard can provide several key points about recent events, while ChatGPT provides no information.
ChatGPT is able to gather information from previous conversations and previous interactions with the user, allowing them to use context to initiate a discussion.
Conclusion: Which is better between ChatGPT and Google BARD?
Comparing the performance of ChatGPT against Google BARD, it is evident that ChatGPT 4 is superior in many areas. While both AI models for language could be improved, ChatGPT 4 takes a more human-like and sophisticated approach to text creation.
On the other hand, Google BARD seems to be limited in its current version. Although it is based on human conversations, it is evident that BARD also uses research data to provide live information.
This limits its capabilities as a flexible language AI model and it may not be the ideal option for tasks that require natural language processing and require a greater variety of contexts and information.
Overall, while both AI models have their advantages, ChatGPT 4 seems to be the more flexible and advanced choice for tackling a wide range of tasks requiring language. But remember that they both evolve and their abilities will continue to evolve over time.
Their growth is sure to make the rivalry between ChatGPT and Google BARD even more interesting, and we'll be here to keep you informed with the latest news. Stay tuned for more
.jpg)
0 Comments